Mixed-Mode Testing
Hybrid HIL/SIL Testing: Planung & Implementierung
Thundercomm ADAS-ECU + Snapdragon Ride + CARLA Simulation: 90% der kritischen Bugs früh finden, bevor echte Testfahrten beginnen.
Warum Hybrid? Kosten vs. Sicherheit
| Testmodus | Kosten | Vertrauen | Zeitlinie |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reine SIL (CARLA) | Niedrig | 60% | Schnell |
| Reine HIL (Testfahrt) | Hoch | 95% | Lang |
| Hybrid HIL/SIL ✓ | Moderat | 90% | Mittel |
Architektur: Thundercomm ECU + Snapdragon Ride
CARLA Simulation Environment
v0.9.15 · ROS2// Synthetic sensor feeds for ADAS validation
Scenario
Roads & Intersections
Traffic
Dynamic Vehicles
Pedestrians
Randomized Agents
Sensors
Camera · LiDAR · Radar
Simulated Sensor Feeds [ROS2]
Thundercomm ADAS-ECU
Hardware · ASIL-D// Production-grade inference platform
Snapdragon Ride Flex SoC
- Oryon CPU — ARMv9 architecture
- Hexagon NPU — INT8 quantized inference
- Safety Island — ISO 26262 ASIL-D compliant
Real Output [CAN / Ethernet]
Vehicle Actuation Commands
Real-timeBrake Command
0.00 – 1.00 [normalized]
Steering Angle
±700° [deg]
Implementierungs-Roadmap
| Phase | Meilenstein | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | Infrastruktur | ECU Firmware baseline, CARLA scenario library |
| Baseline | Kern-Tests | 10 core scenarios, latency profile |
| Fault Injection | Fehlertoleranz | 5 critical faults, watchdog validation |
| Environmental | Randbedingungen | Rain, night, heavy traffic scenarios |
| Traceability | Nachweise | 100% test-to-requirement links |
| Assessment | Freigabe | ASPICE report, ECU ready for HiL |
3.5x
ROI vs. HiL-only
90%
Bugs früh gefunden
6
Phasen
-40%
Kosten vs. HiL-only